Mridula
Bajaj, Executive Director - Mobile Crèches
When
did the education component project get included in the Mobile
Crèches ?
Right
from the initial days which is about thirty-five years back.
We started with the idea of just providing physical care to
the young children on the construction sites but within a few
days we realized that we have to go beyond just custodial care.
Children need to be occupied and the best way to keep them occupied
is by providing them activities and these activities should
lead to a goal, so education became our primary goal.
In
which cities Mobile Crèches is running as of now ?
The
programme runs in the three cities of Delhi, Mumbai and Pune.
The Mumbai and Pune Branches came into existence in 1980 and
1974, very soon after the Delhi programme stabilized.
Soon
thereafter the board realized that as an NGO, one cannot go
on expanding.
We
preferred to facilitate others rather than expanding ourselves.
It
is not a profit making organisation so it was important to help
other NGOs to do similar work, through training and other support.
It
was important for us to focus our energies on retaining quality
and for that we needed to remain small.
Why
only Delhi, Mumbai, Pune - I think these are the cities - and
not cities like Bangalore, Hyderabad... ?
We
are looking at the child in the urban scenario within a larger
context. Within this we are focusing upon the migrant child.
Children keep coming from villages with their parents to construction
sites and generally they have nothing to do except to provide
support in household chores and help in the care of the young.
Mobile
Crèches brings focus on the very young children from birth to
6 years of age groups as we feel that this is the most critical
period for development in a Childs life. Most people support
mainstreaming and providing institutional support etc, Mobile
Crèches believes in all this but our goal is to make a foundation
and we feel that if children don't survive due to mal nutrition
or they grow up with all kinds of deficits, the investments
required for remedial measures are very high. Investing in the
young child is a proactive preventive strategy.
All
the other expenses, the government spends on HIV/AIDs, street
children, and deli guests will be saved if one invests in the
young child. It ensures that the child will delinquency grow
with a healthy foundation and the right start. Secondly the
older children are deprived of education because there is nobody
to look after the infants or younger children.
We
also do a lot of awareness building on related issues as just
the simple provision of services do not always lead you to the
correct soluitions. These services are also not provided completely
free.
There
is always a user fee of minimum 2 Rs/month even if the cost
for us is 500 Rs./month. By paying this amount they feel a sense
of ownership. Building awareness is a continuous program. We
have street theatre and use media extensively for the community.
Help
is taken from experts, doctors etc. A holistic approach is employed.
We are providing direct services to the child but we are also
trying to weave in sustainability so that even when Mobile Crèche
is not there these people are prepared to deal with difficult
situations.
They
become aware of the need to go to the doctor, the basics about
hygiene and sanitation etc. There are about 1600 slums, which
don't have adequate toilet facilities.
This is a basic fundamental right of people, where do they go
? Sanitation is also a major cause of all other problems.
What
is the syllabus ?
We
have a non-formal approach, we give them basic skills of life,
which are important for today's life. They should know how to
respond to basic illness.
It is important for them to know the basic legal rights, what
they should do in case of a problem. So we provide them with
very fundamental information.
Basic
literacy also assumes significance, how to make a money order,
open a bank account etc.
From
what standard to what standard you provide education ?
At
the construction site the program goes up to 12 years. We focus
on the very young child at the policy level and at the lobbying
level with the Government but we don't leave them out after
that.
So
our program includes the adolescent also because it is the whole
life cycle approach that we employ.
We
have a very good relationship with all our children. They come
with their problems, if they are going under stress or any other
problem, we have special programs for them also.
We
don't call it an education program as such. But the formal education
goes up to 12 years and then we facilitate tutorial support.
We try and get volunteers to support them in their weak subjects.
Our
main aim in the urban scenario is to mainstream them. We ensure
that every child who goes through our programme gets admission
into formal school.
We
don't want to duplicate services but we are preparing them to
get enrolled in school. We are helping them to learn.
Are
you planning to widen your base ?
We
are more into training and sharing our expertise with others.
We have trained till now about 3000 women from about 100 NGOs
and other community members over a period of time.
Deepalya,
CASP, Tilonia, Jagori, Urmul etc. all these NGOs have received
training from us. We are building the base for other NGOs, so
it makes no point for us to also go there and start work.
We expect that the NGOs would incorporate Early Child Hood Care
and Development with their work. Our idea is to bring the issues
of the young child in to everybody's agenda.
Education does not start at 6 years. You cannot expect a child
to suddenly start writing and doing well without any foundation.
Development
actually starts at birth and therefore to strengthen education
one has to adopt the life cycle approach.
We
firmly believe in very high quality work. We want an approach,
which is more sustainable in the long run.
What
is the age profile of your students ? And what percentage of
your children are girls ?
It
goes up to 12 years and regarding the % of girls, it is largely
equal.
We
do encourage girls specially to carry on with their education.
In some ways we do make a choice in favor of girls, when we
give scholarship etc., but we are concerned with all the children.
What
is the drop out rate ?
At
the construction site, the movement of labour and the constant
migration influences the number of children attending jour programme.
We
have very little control as their movement largely depends on,
whether they have received their payments or whether they have
decided to return to their villages because of an emergency.
Tracking
is very difficult but we do try to keep in touch with some of
our older children but the reality is so different.
It
is difficult to keep a track of them so it is almost impossible
to keep such records.
Who
teaches the students ? Regular teachers, Volunteers and is there
any manual for them ?
All
the workers in our organisation are paid employees. There is
a separate volunteer program, which goes side by side but we
have around 130 paid staff in Delhi. We have a highly structured
organization.
Most
of our staff joined us about 20-30 years ago. We also provide
training to semi literate and non-literate women for early childcare.
We
don't think literacy per se is important to provide care for
young children. We have special modules of training for them.
There
is a constant in-service training program, conducted every month
for our staff at the head office.
Do
you have a manual which can be given to other NGOs which would
start such a project under your umbrella or otherwise
We
have a host of manuals and books, which we provide and share
with other NGOs and I am happy to say that a lot of NGOs have
started this program on child care because of our intervention.
The
concept of Aanganwadi, Balwadi is derived from the Mobile Crèches
programme.
Can
this project be replicable in other cities ?
We
are hoping it to happen but it is very difficult to work with
construction site workers. Some times there is no room, no fan
etc. and I feel most of the people don't prefer working in these
conditions.
Also,
in our day care project we are working with very young children,
which is very expensive due to the need for a high adult child
ratio. Imparting education to older children as compared to
our program is much cheaper.
It
is a program with lots of responsibilities, so very few NGOs
want to take it. They prefer to be much rather involved with
children above 6 years.
What
is the Funding pattern ?
We
raise 30% of the funds on our own through our sponsorship and
other programs. The rest is raised from Government and other
agencies. We don't go for regular Government schemes because
of the long paper work involved.
Currently
we are running into a high deficit and through out the year
our agenda is to close the gaps and meet the requirements but
it is not easy especially for our advocacy work.
We
have talked to a number of corporates but they are more concerned
about, " what is there for us in this proposal". The challenge
is to tap the vast potential within India for which one requires
and strong Resource Mobilization team.
Builders
put how much money ? What is your relationship with the builders
?
Builders
do share some part of the cost of the project. But it varies
from builder to builder. It varies from 10% to 70% of the total
cost. They provide the basic infrastructure like space electricity
etc and sometimes they provide local helpers as well.
Some
of these services are mandatary by law. Anyway provision of
crèches at construction sites is beneficial, for them in the
long run as it prevents on site accidents.
A
large number of builders are now doing it on their own after
seeing our project and its benefits and many of them are committed
to it and have incorporated crèches as part of policy.
It is not a very good relationship we share with the builders
as they are reluctant to subsidize their profit. They also feel
that making buildings is their core business and they do not
have they know how to run such programmes.
Which
funding agencies support you ?
Nearly
all the funding agencies have had partnerships with us in a
span of the past 35 years.
Currently we have Bernard Van Leev Foundation, Plan International,
IGSSS Save the Children have supported our work for many years.
What
are your concerns ?
As
an NGO, my concern is that we have been in this field for so
many years but we actually have not been very successful in
making the dent for the young child.
I recently went to US and I found there is so much awareness
among the general public on how important it is to us invest
in the young child. This concern is missing in India. Everybody
is now talking about Education, just because Amrtya Sen has
brought it to India. There is a hype of education, education
at any cost.
The "Abhiyaan" has suddenly caught everybody's fancy You find
NGOs, alliances coming together Sarva Shiksha on this issues
but people are not going deep into this. The 86th constitutional
amendment left out the child under 6 years and that's a big
set back to us.
If the foundations are not strong how can one expect universalization
- the issues of learning, drop out rates keep emerging. Blame
is put on the poor people without looking at the real reasons.
People
should realize that if the foundations are weak if, the children
don't have enough to eat and they are suffering from diseases
all the time, where will they find time to learn.
So,
I think a holistic approach for community development needs
to be taken up and we should focus on the whole life cycle approach.
That
is for me the primary concern, not picking small issues here
and there and wanting to achieve all. We are not talking here
about numbers, we are here talking about people and people in
their entire aspect.
What
can others who would start a similar project learn from you
in terms of avoiding some issues or focusing energies on some
issues ?
Actually
the learning cannot be inducted so soon. But still the following
are important steps to be taken;
1)
Involve the community in all your decisions making processes.
2) Have good human resource, as without it none of your program
can be successful, so invest in them, pay them well and give
them good training.
3)
You should have good systems in place, for instance feed back
systems, monitoring systems etc. and then also look for financial
stability for the NGO, which we did not. So from the beginning
one should look into all these issues.
- Madhavi Mehta
( Mumbai
)
|